User talk:PantheraLeo1359531

Archiv 0 | Archiv 2020| Archiv 2021

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PantheraLeo1359531!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbau an der Konradskirche 20231228 HOF03708 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umbau an der Konradskirche 20231228 HOF03755 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tag der Deutschen Einheit in Mödlareuth 20231003 HOF00481 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rendering von Seite Sierpiński-Pyramide 20230513 002 RGB16.png, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rendering von Seite Sierpiński-Pyramide 20230513 002 RGB16.png has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landesamt für Umwelt Hof 20231228 HOF03676 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ernst-Reuter-Straße 119 20231228 HOF03683 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Of course the building equipment in the foreground is disturbing, but as it should illustrate the construction work, this seems acceptable. --Plozessor 19:51, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee bei Dämmerung 20231230 HOF04190-HDR-1 RAW-Export cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Would be better without the person approaching but I think it's ok. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee während der blauen Stunde 20231230 HOF04288 RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Laitche 22:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee bei Dämmerung 20231230 HOF04204-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White balance is off (check the birch on the right side). --Plozessor 05:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thank you for your note, does it meet your criterias now? :) --PantheraLeo1359531 14:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC) Unfortunately no. It is now brighter (better than before), but the birch tree is still blue (#5599ea). Also there's now slight CA on some trees (but that could be tolerated). --Plozessor 16:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Despite a tiny flaws, it's enough to promotion. --Laitche 23:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Die Wertschaft am Abend 20231230 HOF04314-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is also a beautiful picture but seems to have too intense blue. --Plozessor 05:41, 7 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks, changes applied --PantheraLeo1359531 13:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)  Support It still is a bit blueish but I think it is acceptable now. --Plozessor 16:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Most memorable shot

Hi PantheraLeo1359531 the 2023 iteration of Your most memorable shot has arrived. Maybe you want to enrich it with one of your photos? That would be great! Just wanting to help to spread a nice idea, best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Wow, tolle Sache! Danke dir :), ich gucke später mal rein --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 20231122 HOF01963-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 20231122 HOF01948-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy A34 5G 20231122 HOF02013-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willy-Brandt-Allee 20230917 HOF09975-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. That this track was named “Willy-Brandt-Allee” seems to indicate that Bavarian authorities did not like Willy Brandt ;–). --Aristeas 20:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC) This would be quite naughty :D --PantheraLeo1359531 15:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

File:The Open Source Way - Episode 1.pdf

File:The Open Source Way - Episode 1.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Omphalographer (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

File:3D-Modell des Sierpinski-Dreiecks 20220520 Iteration 01.stl

File:3D-Modell des Sierpinski-Dreiecks 20220520 Iteration 01.stl has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2607:FB91:8E13:153D:B9EB:5C1C:351F:53DA.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:46, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untreusee bei Dämmerung 20231230 HOF04204-HDR RAW-Export BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, but I would suggest to try to get the midtones a bit brighter. Right now it looks a bit gloomy, making the midtones brighter would IMHO improve the overall impression. --Aristeas 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks, I did adjust it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 11:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)  Support Thank you! IMHO it’s even better now --Aristeas 19:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Die Wertschaft am Abend 20231230 HOF04314-HDR RAW-Export.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Die Wertschaft am Abend 20231230 HOF04314-HDR RAW-Export.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Wahlstand der SPD an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 005.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wahlstand der SPD an der Plauen-Galerie 20190828 005.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Didym (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony FE 24-105mm F4 G OSS 20230104 HOF07713 RAW-Export 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abriss der Industrieruine an Yorckstraße (Hof (Saale)) 20240221 151129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laptop der Marke exone go 20240203 HOF06886 RAW-Export 000276.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zusatzzeichen als Verbotszeichen 20240229 HOF09384 RAW-Export 000417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 20:31, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinweisschilder zu Straßeneinbauten 20240229 HOF09466 RAW-Export 000453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gestutzter Baum 20240229 HOF09442 RAW-Export 000443.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gestutzter Baum 20240229 HOF09456 RAW-Export 000449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalgeber mit "Signal kommt" 20240229 HOF09487 RAW-Export 000463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Shougissime 20:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

About File:Threadripper CPU Installation Guide! How Socket TR4 Works.webm

Can you not directly copy the YouTube descriptions to commons? For tech YouTubers in particular, they contain almost nothing relevant to the subject of the video and are full of content that makes this video look like an automatic G10 coming from anyone else. (Side note: how much of the IBM Plex Sans JP font have you imported? I started sorting the characters into subcats by line width, and was wondering if its feasible for them to be tagged at upload. If not, I completely understand, and will rerun the cat-a-lot job about once a week. ) Alachuckthebuck (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Alachuckthebuck,

thank you for your comment! Indeed, the Youtube description is not useful in that case. I added some information about the process of equipping the CPU to the mainboard. Thank you also for your commitment on the IBM Plex Sans JP topic. In total, there are about 70,000 glyphs, only about 3,500 left. I will try to upload by stroke width, so the files can be categorized in the respective cat (Thin, Bold, etc.). Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your help, but don't mess up your workflow over this. The upload order doesn't matter that much, as the sort and categorization is run via a custom search query and cat-a-lot runs in batches of 1k-5k pages depending on how busy the server is. Do you think there is an efficient way of adding Unicode categories to each image? (Ie cat:UniFA63, ) I'm not familiar with how commons has handled font categorization in the past, especially for non-English characters.

All the best - Alachuckthebuck (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

It's not a problem at all :). The Unicode issue is a good question... I export the glyphs in Font Forge. And it adds the name of the glyph to the filename, which is often a Unicode. Changing it manually would take too much time, but if there is an automated tool, I am open for it :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not suggesting we change the name, if we do that, tagging becomes much more of a pain, I'm just suggesting that we create a cat for each unicode character (textbook AWB/Bot task, but unless you're planning on importing another font anytime soon, AWB is the way to go.)

All the best - Chuck ^{talk to me} 19:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Sounds like a lot of work, creating a cat for every Unicode character. But I think I will focus on importing prominent fonts :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Cat-a-lot it is.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 20:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Just let me know when this font is done, and I'll rerun the cat-a-lot for the categories I have done, and start on the cats that I haven't gotten to yet.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 20:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

I will, thank you :), greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 07:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Chuck ^Talk,

the font is uploaded now :). I added the files in the subcats already. Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! How many different line thickness does each character have? I know a few of the thickness don't have corresponding subcats yet.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 18:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I think it should be 8. I have Bold; Extra Light; Light; Medium; Regular; SemiBold; Text and Thin :). Regards --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

All 8 have a subcat? if not I'll get on that and you can continue uploading the KR version.

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 18:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, I think the JP font should have 8. THe KR font subcats will take some time to upload and fill :). Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

just let me know when it is done. (the "regular" catagory is a pain, as I have to sort the font and then hand check about 100 or so.)

All the best - Chuck ^Talk 19:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I can imagine! Yes, I will try to remember :), greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verstaubte Radiatoren Kolink Observatory 20240323 HOF1128 000153 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterseite des AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 20240407 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Micron MTC40F204681RC48BA1R 20240407 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 00:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

IBM Plex Sans JP catigorisation

Hello Leo, I have finished the majority of the categorization for the font, but can't finish the regular line width category with all 71,000 images in the IBM Plex Sans JP category, and wanted your thoughts on diffusing the category to only contain the 8 subcats. this would also make finishing the categorization possible by finding the 800 odd images that don't have their subcat yet.

On another note, Thanks for adding categories to the IBM Plex Sans KR font at upload.

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 16:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I think diffusing to the 8 subcats sounds good to me.

Happy to contribute :)

Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the offer, but I can handle the diffusion by myself

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 18:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you :), have a nice and relaxing weekend --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteres Tor 1 vor Abriss HOF2093 RAW-Export 000028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unteres Tor 1 vor Abriss HOF2087 RAW-Export 000027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 13:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)