User talk:MGA73
|
An idea[edit]
- A Comment: This Category has 96,000 images and most (maybe 90%) still have images at the flickr source. Maybe the images in this Category could be tagged with {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} & {{Flickrreview}} by your bot to reduce this amount and it would place those where the images were deleted on the flickrlink into a smaller images not found category. Then the PD-Mark images could be reviewed...if the flickrbot said they were licensed as pd-mark at upload as these 3 cases below.
These 3 images would then end up in the images not found category and can manually be passed perhaps by anyone since the bot said the license was pd-mark at upload and the uploader is certainly trustworthy. But if the bot said the deleted image was not found, I would not touch it.
- File:Jasper Blom Quartet 14 december 2011 Schuttershof Middelburg - Jasper Blom (50890659176).jpg
- File:Jasper Blom Quartet 14 december 2011 Schuttershof - Jesse van Ruller (50890657616).jpg
- File:Yazz Ahmed Quartet, 19 april 2019 TV - Ralph Wyld DSC02904 (46730438495).jpg
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
{{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} & {{Flickrreview}} causes the flickrbot to pass an image as in this case and this second case --Leoboudv (talk) 09:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I think it would be worth working on that idea. The risk are files that are now own work. For example old photos. --MGA73 (talk) 17:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting your bot to work on Category:Files from khteWisconsin Flickr stream
- Please consider requesting a new {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} & {{Flickrreview}} in this now 95,000 image Category by your bot because many of the photos still have an image of the flickrlink. Perhaps up to 90%. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- I wonder if there is any reason to ask Flickrreview bot to do a new review. If it allready confirmed the license it will just give the bot extra work. What needs to be done is for someone to judge if the photo looks like own work. If we think that it is it would be easier just to have my bot pass it like it did with files from khteWisconsin. --MGA73 (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps we could start by checking the bigger flickr user categories like Category:Photographs by Mathias Appel and then pass those if we think it is most likely own work. --MGA73 (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
These 4-5 flickr account owners still license their images as PD-Mark and their images are certainly their own work. Your bot could just 'pass' their images on Commons below...if the bot said the imamge was pdmark. If not, why not ask your bot tag them with a new {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} & {{Flickrreview}}
- Flickr account Flickr code: 154119024@N06 211 photos on Commons
- Flickr account Flickr code: 193131310@N04 793 photos on Commons
- Flickr account Flickr code: annedavid2012 762 photos on Commons
- Flickr account Flickr code: julien_maury 798 images on Commons if one types in julien_maury & flickr
- Soccer Digital has 1389 images on Commons. Today their images are ARR since Feb 27, 2024 but their older images and the ones uploaded on Commons are still PD-Mark...like this one
- As an aside, Mathias Appel licenses his images as CC0 so the flickrbot automatically passed his images. Even today, it is still CC0...as I checked his photostream and it was CC0 in 2016 as this photo review shows. So, there is no need to examine his photos on Commons. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
I may be away this weekend but these numbers from the 4-5 accounts above are manageable, I think for a new flickrreview on a {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} license to have the bot actually pass their photos. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Yes those accounts looked like own work so I fixed them. However, it seems that the number of files do not match 100%. I noticed this account Category:Photographs by Prefeitura de Pelotas. It also says "Arquivo de Fotos" so I wonder if it is own work or just a collection of photos. --MGA73 (talk) 16:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- The reason may be perhaps because I reviewed some images....and knew there were a lot more. "Arquivo de Fotos" translates as "Photo Archive". Why wouldn't the Prefecture de Pelotas have an archive of pictures. I thought it was if a different professional photographer was named that it was unsafe to review. Just my thoughts. Nothing more. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK. Their photos do name a photographer like 'Foto Rodrigo Chagas' etc. In this situation, we don't know if the photographer was paid by the prefecture so it may be unsafe to pass them indeed. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Yeah. Anyway the files are reviewed by a bot so there is no rush working on them. :-) I noticed that there are other categories too. Like Category:Flickr images by miguel.discart needing human review. I wonder why bot did not review those. --MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The Discart images are clearly own work but the bot review says "size not found". I don't know why it says that if the image is not cropped...but it happens. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I asked bot for a new review. That fixed most of them. But time to sleep here... See ya! --MGA73 (talk) 22:14, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Sleep well. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
2 accounts[edit]
Could your account pass any flickr images licensed as PDM from these 2 accounts:
- Robb Hannawacker: Flickr id: 39422575@N02
I keep finding his images trapped in the 95,000 category like this File:Uncas Skipper, Hesperia uncas, female, Hart's Draw Road, 6900', Abajo Mountains, Utah. 28 June 2019, Robb Hannawacker 2 (49531477081).jpg & File:Uncas Skipper, Hesperia uncas, female, Hart's Draw Road, 6900', Abajo Mountains, Utah. 28 June 2019, Robb Hannawacker 5 (49531468741).jpg
This is the hard one:
- Gary Todd Flickr id: 101561334@N08 has 101,000 images on Commons. Mr. Todd has changed the license of his images from CC0 to PD-Mark sometimes which means some of his images are trapped in the 90,000 image category like these below....and many many more which I don't know of.
- File:Upper Part of Etruscan Bronze Monumental Statue with 19th C. additions, c. 40 BC (48465585637).jpg
- File:Asinan Pillbox, WWII Japanese Bunker, General Santos City Beach, Mindanao, Philippines 04d.jpg
- File:Buayan Quarry Pillbox, WWII Japanese Bunker, General Santos City Near Japanese Airbase, Mindanao, Philippines 05b.jpg
- File:Guadalupe Pillbox, WWII Japanese Bunker in Mountains North of General Santos City, Mindanao, Philippines 10f.jpg
- File:World War II Japanese Bunker, General Santos City, Mindanao, Philippines 02b.jpg
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: World History Photos were taken By Gary Lee Todd as this statement says . Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I actually thought I fixed the files by Gary. I worked on the files in Category:Photographs by Gary Lee Todd. But it seems there are some not in this category. --MGA73 (talk) 07:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Probably people did not know about the Category:Photographs by Gary Lee Todd. Your bot already passed more than 2500+ images from Todd's account. I knew he had many quality images trapped in the 90,000 image PDM category. Unfortunately, I have to work on Sunday and Monday as I am an independent contractor in the private sector. But don't forget about *Robb Hannawacker: Flickr id: 39422575@N02 who also has some images in the 90,000 category. Goodnight from Metro Vancouver, Canada where it is 2:18 AM. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am going to bed now But I forgot to mention about MTur or Flickr Id: 163189519@N03 who license their images as PD-Mark and have five thousands of images on Commons also in the 90,000 Category like this: [[:File:CacioMurilo MercadoArtesanato JoãoPessoa PB (27017927218).jpg & File:PedroVilela Igreja N.S. da Conceição Jaboticatubas MG (40866652771).jpg & File:Renato Soares Embarções no Porto de Guaragueçaba PR (27023629538).jpg or File:RenatoSoares MercadoMunicipal Curitiba PR (26275540647).jpg, etc. In some cases, people give an attribution license but the bot does not pass it since it shpuld be PDMark. Goodnight for sure, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think both Category:Files from MTur Destinos Flickr stream and Category:Photographs by Robb Hannawacker are now fixed (in perhaps 30 minutes when bot finishes). --MGA73 (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it is now fixed. Thanks for all your help here. I have to work Sunday and Monday but just wanted to thank you. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Three suggestions: Perhaps 1. your bot could pass images from PMO Barbados Flickr id#: 141562286@N04 with about 1471 images which should be all PD-Mark
Sometimes people give the right license and the image is not passed and sometimes they give the wrong CC BY SA license and the image is also not passed. But the flickr license seems to be PD-Mark:
- File:National Population Commission Meeting (50452195823).jpg
- File:UNCTAD XV- World Leaders Summit - Dialogue II- Inequality.jpg
2. your bot could pass images from Ajuntament de les Franqueses del Vallès Flickr Id#: 122076518@N08 with 447 images on Commons if the license was still PDM.
3. your bot could pass images from Bernard Sporagg, NZ Flickr id#: 88123769@N02 who sometimes has the habit of deleting some of his images like the first one...if license is PDM. He has several images in the large 90,000 category.
Sleep well. I will be away. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Going the right way with Category:Flickr images needing human review (a few categories are now empty or gone). There is also Category:Flickr videos needing human review but there are fewer files there :-) --MGA73 (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your help. I have to work a lot this Monday in the real world but thanks again for dealing with the Bernard Spragg problem whose images are PD but then deletes his fungi photos sometimes. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
4 accounts[edit]
This Flickr account may be interesting for your bot to give a try. Today this person licenses her images as ARR but in the past and in her older images, the flickr license seems to be PDM still.
- ksblack00 Flickr Id #: 91064752@N03 with 421 images on Commons if one types ksblack99 & flickr. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
This second Flickr account also licenses its images as PDM and it has many in the now 80,000 image category:
- Deputado Rosenmerg Flickr id#: rosembergpinto There are 1028 images on Commons on a PDM license I believe
I passed one image from this account below and did not get any message saying the account was blacklisted.
Thirdly, this flickr account also licenses its images as PDM and has about 600+ images in the 80,000 image category:
- Etienne Baudon Flickr id#: 186165403@N05
Finally, this account in the past licensed their images as PDM (today its ARR) but the images on Commons are still PDM
- Artic Warrior Flickr id#: arcticwarrior There are Artic Warrior
928 images on Commons if one types in arcticwarrior & flickr
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- I will have a look later :-) --MGA73 (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Artic Warrior seems to be a mix of old and new photos. Many of the photos are uploaded with the license {{PD-USGov-Military-Air Force}}. I noticed that some photos on Flickr are not US Military photos (example https://www.flickr.com/photos/avgeekjoe/51424345857) so if we pass the photos we should hope they got the license right :-) --MGA73 (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well 99.5% of their images here seem to be public domain from what I can see. The best option is to check if the flickrbot marked the image as pdm or not and not tag them with {{PD-USGov-Military-Air Force}}. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think we can 'trust' Artic Warrior. I checked through many of his their images and most are US Army or Public Domain. I also flickrpassed one of their 3 images below and did Not get a bad author list or blacklist message at all. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- File:Exercise Timberline (52907630487).jpg
- File:Regional Combat Training Center rotation in Alaska, March-April 2023 - 11th Airborne Division conducts JPMRC-AK 23-02 (52813160892).jpg
- File:UAA Cadet Shadows 525 Maintenance Officer.jpg
- Also this other flickr account owner below licensed all her images as PDM until October 7, 2023. Since that date, it has been ARR.
- Maggie jones There are 1500 images and I have passed maybe 20 or 30 of her images already. It is better to have your bot pass her images, I think, if they were tagged as pd-mark by the flickrbot. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- The bot have reviewed and verified that all the files in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review were available on Flickr as PDM. The only thing left for humans to do is 1) to decide if the license tag should be changed to {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} or let the existing license stay unchanged adn 2) if it is likely that the file really is PD or if the flickr user just uploaded the work of someone else. So far we have only fixed files where we think it is likely that the copyright is correct. Have you ever noticed files where you think the license tag is incorrect? --MGA73 (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Adding to Category:Files from Arctic Warrior Flickr stream now. Starting with those that have the {{PD-USGov-Military-Air Force}}. Then we can see what is left. --MGA73 (talk) 15:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- The bot have reviewed and verified that all the files in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review were available on Flickr as PDM. The only thing left for humans to do is 1) to decide if the license tag should be changed to {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} or let the existing license stay unchanged adn 2) if it is likely that the file really is PD or if the flickr user just uploaded the work of someone else. So far we have only fixed files where we think it is likely that the copyright is correct. Have you ever noticed files where you think the license tag is incorrect? --MGA73 (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: So far, I have not, I confess. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please don't forgot to get request your bot to pass Maggie jones 1500 images since they were marked as PDM by the bot in this category. I have passed 20 or 30 images by her...but this is too much for one person. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Her flickr account is *Maggie jones Jones' images were licensed as as PDM until October 7, 2023 when she changed it to ARR but the images on Commons are still licensed as PDM on her flickr account. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Bot was busy with something else. I found a messy code that made it hard for bot to work on the files. So I did some cleanup: Special:Diff/863962152. --MGA73 (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Its OK. Take your time. Tomorrow is Good Friday already in 2024. How time flies! Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your help Michael on Maggie Jones and Artic Warrior. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I wonder if we should just pass everyone. The bot checked them so guess its a waste of time that humans also look at them :-) --MGA73 (talk) 09:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think this is a reasonable idea so long as the source flickr account has no copyright violations. I have to sign off now But passing everything gives everything a new slate.
The exceptions may be images from a flickr account with PDM images where I filed this DR and these 3 images are also from this account but I forgot to file a DR. I had filed a separate DR that was not connected to PDM and it grew to more images that were tagged by other users.
New discussion[edit]
So, yes. Your bot should pass all the PDM tagged flickr images except 3 images from this flickrwashing account unless you know of anymore flickrwashing accounts. I have to go to bed know but most PDM images are basically own work. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- The problem with those are derivative works. Bot can't tell if something is a derivative work. It can only tell if the license on Flickr is good or not. And if some users are bad the bot can put them on the naughty list. The question is if there are any bad Flickr users in the category. If you have time it would be great if you could hunt for bad photos before the bot passes them. --MGA73 (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: If you see the photos in the Category it is easy to tell that most are in fact own work.
- SDASM photos are OK. I passed many like this and did not get a single bad author's message.
- Queensland State Archives from Australia is OK with 658 images on Commons
- Pedro Ragaglia is OK too
- Elusive Muse is interesting; they claim their photos are PD. I reviewed one photo here and did not get a bad author's message. They have 217 images on Commons which look PD since they are black and white.
- Great Place to Work Deutschland seems OK; I passed this image with no issues. They have 226 images on Commons
- Gov Eric Holcomb of Indiana is legitimate; his newer images are PD-Mark.
- Gobierno de Guatemal is legitimate; they have 1479 images on Commons.
Its like I said, when you go in this Category you can easily figure out which images are 'own work' and which are not safe to review. Most are safe to review except this obvious case....which was the uploader's only image here.
Good night. I have Have Good Friday mass today. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I made a little test. If the file is licensed {{PDMark-owner}} the bot will not pass it Special:Diff/864127010 but if I change to {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} the bot will pass Special:Diff/864127231.
- If I do it like that the bot will check if the flickr user is black listed. --MGA73 (talk) 14:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- That is an excellent idea. If you wish to order the bot to carry out a pass, please do so as you do not need my input here. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I have been testing a bit more. The files go to Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review and if they are passed they are removed again. So the first files in the category are some that could not be passed by Flickreview bot. --MGA73 (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK that is quite fine. so perhaps other reviewers can pass them, too. I have Good Friday mass soon and will be resting later. I reviewed 3 or 4 images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Yes they might need a human review. If you review some make sure you start from the top. The bot is still working on the files. --MGA73 (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I reviewed a few like this one and this one. I guess the MGA bot will remove the extra tag later. I will sign off soon for a 2-3 hour Friday mass and then rest. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Yes my bot will remove the temporary template. If the file have the usual {{Flickrreview}} then the Flickr review bot have not checked it yet. --MGA73 (talk) 21:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- You may have to deal with images like this where the flickr source was deleted but the flickrbot ays the image was pd-mark at upload. It shows Nikki Fried who is the head of the Democratic Party in Florida and is used on her English wikipedia article: File:11th Annual Climate Summit - Hosted by Monroe County.jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also this image and this image and this image where the flickr source is hidden permanently and no human can review them...but the flickrbot says they were pd-mark at upload. I can sign into flickr but I have no permission to view the images. I think you or I should just pass them. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: As an Aside your Category is not listed Here so reviewers cannot review them since they cannot see the category, I think. But based on the 'U..S. Department of Veterans Affairs' metadata, they are PD images. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: The bot allready reviewed them earlier so all we need to do is fix like this: Special:Diff/864203359. We just need to check if it is likely the Flickr user is/was the copyright holder of if it is a derivative work or for some other reason should not be passed. If there are many from one account the bot can fix. --MGA73 (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- And I have not listed it in the category because it is a sub category of Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review. Also there is no reason to have more reviewers look at the files right now while the bot is still working on them. --MGA73 (talk) 21:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: The bot allready reviewed them earlier so all we need to do is fix like this: Special:Diff/864203359. We just need to check if it is likely the Flickr user is/was the copyright holder of if it is a derivative work or for some other reason should not be passed. If there are many from one account the bot can fix. --MGA73 (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK. PS: I am signing off now but as I said, this image and this image and this image where the flickr source is hidden permanently and no human can review them...but based on the metadata they are PD. Goodbye, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I will go to bed too. My bot will not remove the temporary review template while I sleep. But Flickrreview bot should finish all the files it can. --MGA73 (talk) 21:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: My bot have now asked for a flickr review for all files tagged with PD-licenses. My guess is that it will catch most of the old photos. I hope that there will only be a few files left in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review that does not look like own work after that. The Flickr review bot will need a few hours to work on he files (it is currently working on files starting with the letter P). --MGA73 (talk) 08:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I will go to bed too. My bot will not remove the temporary review template while I sleep. But Flickrreview bot should finish all the files it can. --MGA73 (talk) 21:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: That is a good idea. My Catholic church mass was 3 hours long and I will be signing off soon as its 2:35 AM here now in Mero Vancouver, Canada. I filed a DR on these 3 photos: ****image
- image
- image
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: You're the best :-) --MGA73 (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: All done now. Good thing is that there are not that many files left in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review now that the Flickr review bot reviewed all the files it could. Sadly I can't think of a way to make the bot skip those that are possibly bad. --MGA73 (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: You're the best :-) --MGA73 (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes you can. Images from the account below are OK/own work.
- SDASM photos are OK. I passed many like this and did not get a single bad author's message.
- Queensland State Archives from Australia is OK with 658 images on Commons
- Pedro Ragaglia is OK too with many images though I marked maybe 80 of them and they all pass flickrreview.
- Elusive Muse is interesting; they claim their photos are PD. I reviewed one photo here and did not get a bad author's message. They have 217 images on Commons which look PD since they are black and white.
- Great Place to Work Deutschland seems OK; I passed this image with no issues. They have 226 images on Commons
- Gov Eric Holcomb of Indiana is legitimate; his newer images are PD-Mark.
- Gobierno de Guatemala is legitimate; they have 1479 images on Commons.
Thanks for all your efforts, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Just don't pass this image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I guess you will be going to bed soon. Please don't forget to pass images from the first 6 of the 7 flickr accounts below which are certainly legitimate:
- Great Place to Work Deutschland seems OK; They have 226 images on Commons
- Gov Eric Holcomb of Indiana is legitimate; his newer images are PD-Mark.
- Gobierno de Guatemala is legitimate; they have 1479 images on Commons.
- Phlips photos is legitimate and has 244 images on Commons. I tried to review one image but it was deleted on flickr but the file history said the image was PDM at upload from the flickrbot.
- ANDARA RUTAS is clearly legitimate and has 177 images on Commons
- Peter Appleby is clearly own work and has 794 images on Commons. Everytime I review one or two images, I find more elsewhere.
- As for Elusive Muse it is interesting; they claim their photos are PD and they are not on a blacklist as I passed one of their photos with no problems.
Regarding Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review some of the photos were marked as PDM at upload, so I typed in a pass but the images are still here since your bot will have to remove the extra review tag. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC) Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Yes all the photos were marked PDM at the upload. The Flickr review bot confirmed that. The only thing left to do is to try to spot copyvios.
- I will have a look at the accounts you mentioned above later. --MGA73 (talk) 06:57, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess you can also get your bot to do another mass pass of PDM images but here are 2 likely copvios here and here Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I could easily just pass all the photos. But I think we should try to see if we can spot most of the bad files before we do that. There is no need to rush because the Flickr review bot allready confirmed the license. So its not like the other reviews where speed is important to avoid loss of files because they were not reviewed before the file was deleted or license was changed. --MGA73 (talk) 09:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Signing off[edit]
Dear Michael, I'm signing off and have Easter mass on Sunday. If you are interested, here are 2 'own work accounts.
- Rob Mitchell He licensed his older 2015 and maybe 2016 photos as PDM.
- Flickr id#: 46958463@N06
This account has a few images under PDM, like these 2 below and several more:
- File:1909 05 22 Le Rire 329. Satirical fashion or lifestyle illustration (graphic work, drawing or painting) for magazine by painter and illustrator Xavier Gosé i Rovira (aka Francisco Javier Gosé etc, 1876-1915).jpg &
- File:1908 12 14 Simplicissimus-1a. Satirical fashion or lifestyle illustration (graphic work, drawing or painting) for magazine by painter and illustrator Xavier Gosé i Rovira (aka Francisco Javier Gosé etc, 1876-1915).jpg
Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This flickr account below also has legitimate PDM images.
- Ministerio de la Produccion Flickr id#: ministeriodelaproduccion has 743 images Most images are not passed or people type in the wrong cc0 license.
- Also this flickr account below:
Tyler Brenot Flickr id#: 152474924@N02 at 72 images Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Please also do
- Presidencia de la Republica del Ecuador HAS TWO FLICKR ID NUMBERS:
- 1) Flickr id#: 7965504@N03 at 1,010 images
- 2) Flickr id #: presidenciaecuador at 526 images
Both are PDM licensed.
There are also ALL PDM licensed images from
- Aleksandr Gorlov Flickr id#: 197207264@N02 at 658 images all PDM license
There are many PDM images from
- Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte (Brazil) Flickr id#: portalpbh at a bit less than 109 images
There are still some PDM images from
- Rob Mitchell Flickr id#: swallowedtail like
- File:1933 BSA Ten 6-light saloon 17443800073.jpg
- File:1934 BSA Ten 6-light saloon.jpg
- This flickr account owner licensed his images as PDM and cc0 in the past and ARR today but the PDM images on Commons are still PDM on his flickr account. He has more than these 2 images. These are just some examples.
There are some PDM images from Bonnie Moreland BUT here Flickr id# is actually: icetsarina as you can see here at 186 images Some images she licensed as cc0 and were passed and others are PD-Mark and did not pass like those below...and more.
- File:Snow on the Freeway Lakes, Oregon - Flickr - Bonnie Moreland (free images).jpg
- File:Morning mist on lavender. Lavender Valley Farms, Oregon - Flickr - Bonnie Moreland (free images).jpg
- File:Red barn in the Joseph area, Oregon (25810965467).jpg
Finally, there are PDM images from
- Utah Reps Flickr id#: utahreps at 188 images
I think its harder to get find single flickr accounts with large amounts of legitimate images now. But at least you brought down the large PDM category from 95,000 images and that may be good enough. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Four accounts[edit]
Dear MGA73,
Here are three flickr accounts with some PDM images whose flickr id number does not match the flickr profile page.
- Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. Flickr id # should be: ministeriebz
They have a bit more images with a PDM license
- Republic of Macedonia Flickr id# should be: 150111929@N04
- File:UNESCO November 2023 meeting - Премиерот Ковачевски во работна посета на Париз - 14.jpg
- File:UNESCO November 2023 meeting - Премиерот Ковачевски во работна посета на Париз - 4.jpg
There are some PDM images from Bonnie Moreland BUT her Flickr id# was once actually: icetsarina as you can see here at 186 images Some images she licensed as cc0 and were passed and others are PD-Mark and did not pass like those below...and more.
- File:Eagle Cap Wilderness, Oregon.jpg
- File:Snow on the Freeway Lakes, Oregon - Flickr - Bonnie Moreland (free images).jpg
- File:Morning mist on lavender. Lavender Valley Farms, Oregon - Flickr - Bonnie Moreland (free images).jpg
- File:Red barn in the Joseph area, Oregon (25810965467).jpg etc, etc
- Here is a Regular PDM image account with the same flickr id name. The images are definitely own work.
- David Steadman Flickr id#: davidgsteadman at 141 images
I ordered new reviews for one or two images from David Steadman...like the one below but there are many more images that have the wrong license tag.
- Under “U” there are also some USDA photo over here with PDM license. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also many likely 'own work images' under "V" over here Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Leoboudv! I'm thinking if it was a good idea to add "Category:Files from <user id-number> Flickr stream" to all the files in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review. That would mean there would be a lot of red categories that could be found via Special:WantedCategories or by clicking a random file and see what category it is in.
- It should be easy to see if all the files in the category looks like own work or not. If yes they can all be passed and if not they can all be failed.
- It should be easy for the bot to pass all files in a category because it will only have to work on those specific files and not all the 20k files.
- If there are only 1 file or 2 in the category it may be easier just to pass the file(s) manually. The category should either be removed or the <user id-number> should probably be changed to the name and the category should be created.
- What do you think? (I will work on the links above before I decise).--MGA73 (talk) 14:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I decided to mark the files in Category:Files from tormentor4555 Flickr stream. I doubt the old photos are own work but it is possibly PD for other reasons. But now they are in a single category they are easier to spot if someone think they are not PD. --MGA73 (talk) 15:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just found out my bot skipped some files because some were licensed "PDM" instead of the usual "PDMark-owner" etc. --MGA73 (talk) 17:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I agree that many images Category:Files from tormentor4555 Flickr stream are not own work. I tried to review one and got a bad authors mesage. But at least, it is easier to spot a few clear copy vios. As for your bot skipping some images because they were licensed as PDM, it would explain why some flickr account images were missed by your MGAbot.
- Here are 9 Reliable flickr accounts with all PDM images:
- Darrell Neufeld Flickr id#: 71308769@N02/ at 27 images
- Extinction Rebellion Sverige Flickr id#: extinctionrebellionsverige at 80 images
- Michigan Lt. Governor Flickr Id#: is ACTUALLY ltgovcalley at 217 images
- Philadelphia City Council Its older Flickr id# for 2016 photos was: phl_council There are 838 images from Philadelphia City Council but in 2016 they licensed their images as PDM. Later, it was CC BY 2.0. and now its ARR.
- I counted 137 images trapped in the PDM category under the phl_council flickr id like these 3 below all taken in 2016:
- File:Philadelphia DA Prescription Drug Lockbox Press Conference (24561767862).jpg
- File:Philadelphia City Council Stated Meeting 2-25-2016 (25288660211).jpg
- File:Philadelphia City Council Stated Meeting 1-21-2016 (24109263154).jpg
- Christopher Wheatley/Dolbadarn Flickr Id#: 145019895@N06 at 40 images
- This person licenses images that are not his own as ARR so he knows about copyright. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- File:Warrington Central Station 90's 18.jpg I requested a flickrreview on a correct PDM license on this single image and it was passed...so this account is not on a blacklist.
- Jim J Flickr Id#: 147764340@N02 at 188 images
- I counted around 140 images under the 'N' aplhabet such as File:NAMM 2017 (31631375344) (by Jim J).jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Iredell County Public Library from North Carolina Flickr Id#: icplphotos has 306 images
Examples:
- File:Red Cloth Horseshoe Photo Album (51358711207).jpg
- File:Red Cloth Horseshoe Photo Album (51359704508).jpg
- File:Iredell County Historical Society (51314730120).jpg
- File:Iredell County Historical Society (51312982327).jpg
All their images are PDM licensed. Apart from this File:Iredell County Historical Society (51312982327).jpg newspaper image from 1971, the photos are almost certainly PD or are simple printed text that do not meet the threshold of copyright.
- Lark Ascending Flickr id#: vwilliams at 309 images has virtually all PDM images on Commons. Today Lark's images are ARR but only since June 10, 2023 from my check of his flickr photostream. Before that date, it was all licensed as PDM...and he did not change the license of his images from PDM before June 10, 2023.
- Finally, *Office of the Prime Minister of Ethiopia Flickr Id#: 145325932@N03 at 587 images
Example: File:PMO IMG 3622 (40547323203).jpg & File:PMO IMG 4927 (47460557772).jpg
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Leoboudv! All marked. Or so I hope :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
A comment[edit]
Thank You Michael,
I think from now on that most of the images in the now smaller PDM category is still own work but it will not be easy to find many images from just one flickr account. Images from these 2 flickr accounts are most likely copy vios below. The first flickr account has only 11 images from the 1950s or 1960s.
As an aside, I did find one legitimate own work flickr account below with a bit more images:
- Eric Corriel The Flickr Id#: eric_corriel at 64 images Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Yeah it will most likely be smaller accounts now. My but is not adding a user category (like Category:Files from 121653663@N05 Flickr stream) to all the files. Once all files are tagged it will be very easy to see how many files there are from the same user. --MGA73 (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. Just to let you know that you don't have to worry about any new flickr images for a while due to this issue The backlog was 100 when I first posted the message and now its 900+. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Here is a second legitimate own work flickr account below with some images:
- Doriane boily Flickr Id#: 147614443@N02 at 21 images
I had reviewed these 2 of her images below:
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Here is a third legitimate own work flickr account below with some images:
- Brandon Evershed Flickr Id#: bevershed at 64 images
- PS: Your new Category here Category:Files from 193131310@N04 Flickr stream actually belongs to Category:Photographs by Daniel Alves who has said his images are in the public domain. THE MGA Bot missed them initially. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also your new Category Category:Files from 126409951@N04 Flickr stream actually belongs to Category:Files from Barry Marsh Flickr stream Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: So Strange, I know there are more Barry Marsh images like this File:Flateyri, Iceland (48763299228).jpg which your bot missed and are still trapped in the PDM category even though its has the same Flickr ID# of 126409951@N04 I THINK I KNOW THE PROBLEM NOW. This Category:Files from Barry Marsh Flickr stream DID NOT HAVE its images PASSED on a PDM license either. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I just did the first test run. All files from Category:Files from 49017692@N05 Flickr stream was passed and category changed to Category:Files from Eric Corriel Flickr stream. It seeems to work well (and fast compared to old way).
I will start working on the other categories when I have some time.
Perhaps you could scan for bad files and tag those? --MGA73 (talk) 06:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will if I have the time. It seems that you have the matter well in hand now. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just one Comment. I had this image deleted: File:Belinda Green, Miss World 1972.jpeg and its source flickr account over here should be added to a blacklist for licensing derivative images on a free PDM license. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Leoboudv yes it seems to go rather well now. Nice catch with the categories that allready existed under another name. There will probably be some where I will miss that and create duplicate categories. But its easy to fix with a category redirect.--MGA73 (talk) 12:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: When I said I THINK I KNOW THE PROBLEM NOW. This Category:Files from Barry Marsh Flickr stream DID NOT HAVE its images PASSED on a PDM license either I was saying that the original images in this category that your bot did not tag, I meant to say that that the Original images in this category here which your bot missed were also PDM images which were not passed like these two examples below and a lot more:
- File:Isafjordur at Night, Iceland (48758473496).jpg
- File:John Ruskin's View, River Lune, Kirkby Lonsdale, Yorkshire (24424615535).jpg
Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank You[edit]
Dear Michael,
Thanks for marking the remaining Barry Marsh images.
Regarding Category:Files from 149271704@N02 Flickr stream this flickr account appear to be own work with camera metadata from three Samsung, Apple and Sony cameras by Ted Potters Since it is your country, you can decide if 2D graffito art is allowed in the second image below:
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I ordered a new review on one of T. Potter's images below and the flickrbot passed the image...which means it is not on a blacklist
- File:Abandoned Sociëteit Casino Venlo (33624754328).jpg
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Secondly, the 140 images in Category:Files from 70125105@N06 Flickr stream by Carlo Raso is almost certainly own work. If you check under carlo raso & flickr, there are 459 Carlo raso flickr images alone on Commons with a Nikon S3600 camera but no one ever created a category for Raso's images. Carlo Raso last uploaded images in 2018 on his flickr account and they seem to be PDM. You also reviewed 2 of his images below:
- File:"Le nozze di Figaro" by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Royal San Carlo Theatre in Naples 01.jpg
- File:"Le nozze di Figaro" by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Royal San Carlo Theatre in Naples 03.jpg
- Thirdly, these 86 images in Category:Files from 137182990@N08 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work. The uploader seems to know copyright and the camera used in the images is a Canon EOS 550D. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Fourthly, these 90 images in Category:Files from 192387570@N06 Flickr stream are own work by Anthony Shaw I passed so many images by this person who today licenses his images as ARR. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Finally, these 42 images from Category:Files from 196143283@N07 Flickr stream most likely own work from Uniao Brasil Rondonia Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Leoboudv! Ted Potters is Dutch not Danish :-) I think most of it is okay (FOP). --MGA73 (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Oops! My mistake. I always thought you were Dutch until I carefully reread your wikicommons page. Well...as they say you learn a new thing every day! Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- He he Leoboudv! Yeah sometimes you gets a surprise. I learned using a bot by a Dutch user. Multichill :-) --MGA73 (talk) 09:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- FOUR Comments:
- Comment: These images from Category:Files from 143240489@N02 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work since they use the same Nikon D3100 camera. The flickr account owner may have changed his/her name: Olga Leyba/Miauly Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also these certainly PD images from Category:Files from 61021753@N02 Flickr stream are from the BioDiversity Heritage Library Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- These images in Category:Files from 197399771@N06 Flickr stream are from the official presidents office of Colombia as it says here: Fotografía Oficial Presidencia de la República de Colombia
- These 5 Bernard Spragg images in Category:Files from 88123769@N02 Flickr stream belong to Category:Photographs by Bernard Spragg
- Finally, these images in Category:Files from 93131719@N04 Flickr stream are certainly own work since the flickr account owner "Oliver Seitz" is named as the photographer in the camera metadata as in the 2 examples below:
- File:Bay arabian foal, Germany.jpg
- File:NDA Shariha Bint Shanah 18.jpg
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: It is nice that Special:WantedCategories is now updated. The most wanted category is Category:Files from 83211576@N03 Flickr stream with 632 files.
- I will mark the categories you checked but I'm busy today so do not know how many I will do today. --MGA73 (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm about to sign off soon...but just do it at your own pace. The category was originally 95,000+ images and you reduced it to just over 10,000+ images. If you reduce it to 500-1,000 images, it may be good enough. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Still work to be done. But now below 8k. --MGA73 (talk) 16:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's great. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Bilderbogen in Neuruppin.jpg[edit]
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bilderbogen in Neuruppin.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
A.Savin 14:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bilderbogen in Neuruppin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
5 accounts[edit]
These images in Category:Files from 36232856@N03 Flickr stream are Public Domain since they come from a US Embassy titled US Embassy Brasilia Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Secondly, images in Category:Files from 189067902@N03 Flickr stream appear to be own work from Shane Morigeau Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Thirdly, images in Category:Files from 47873224@N06 Flickr stream are PD since they come from US Embassy The Hague
Fourthly, images in Category:Files from 88133570@N00 Flickr stream are most likely own work since they were all taken by a Nikon D5100 camera by Marc Wathieu who today licenses his images as ARR.
Finally, images in Category:Files from 42541928@N03 Flickr stream are clearly own work from Sebrae-SP a Brazillian government department. Sebrae "
is an autonomous Brazilian social service, an integral part of System S that aims to assist the development of micro and small businesses, stimulating entrepreneurship in the country" according to Google translate. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The reason the category is more than 8,000 images is that an uploader named Luiz79 uploaded a few hundred pd-mark images without even a license with titles such as File:ARAÇATUBA SP - 22.07.2018 - PR. JÚLIO CÉSAR - DOMINGO DE MANHÃ (42964590754).jpg & File:18-07-2016 Pré Convenção (28365714722).jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
New Column[edit]
- Leoboudv it is not good that new files show up in the category. Uploader should get a notice. --MGA73 (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I will have to work today and have now sent a message about the licensing of PDM images to Luiz79 but I see his talkpage is full of major issues Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The 41 images in Category:Files from 149428202@N04 Flickr stream are own work by Marco Aurelio Conde since the metadata in the pictures say "c) Marco Albuquerque" It is probably a close enough psudonym.
- Secondly, the 24 images in Category:Files from 41262875@N03 Flickr stream are certainly own work by IZilla since the image metadata states the name iZillr Please see below.
- File:Farao at Kantine (24072512187).jpg
The 19 images in Category:Files from 127297238@N06 Flickr stream is most likely own work by San Leandro Privacy with its large number of Photo Albums
- I just ordered a review on one of the images here and flickrreview passed it: File:Singapore Police - Urban Shield.jpg
- The 27 images in Category:Files from 140990958@N04 Flickr stream belong to Category:Photographs by Sigurdur Josuason which was created by the uploader Wolfmann. These images belong to S. Josuason who appears to understand copyright and has a professional website of his own. Josuason also licenses his flickr images today as ARR. The uplaoder Wolfmann has had a few DRs on his talkpage for images that are still in copyright or for FOP issues but no copy vio notices.
- The 31 images in Category:Files from 123738801@N03 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work since they come from Ministerio de Cultura y Patrimonio del Ecuador whose flickr profile translates as "The Ministry of Culture and Heritage of Ecuador exercises the leadership of the National Culture System to strengthen National identity and Interculturality; protect and promote the diversity of cultural expressions; encourage free artistic creation and the production, dissemination, distribution and enjoyment of cultural goods and services; and safeguarding social memory and cultural heritage, guaranteeing the full exercise of cultural rights based on the decolonization of knowledge and power; and a new relationship between human beings and nature, contributing to the materialization of Good Living."
Finally, the 11 images in Category:Files from 42687493@N06 Flickr stream are PD since they come from the US Department of the Interior Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- IMAGES in this Category:Files from 189879265@N04 Flickr stream may be too risky to pass except perhaps the last image reportedly from 1930. I filed Deletion Requests on the first 3 images which come from a flickrwashing account. Any artwork from this person who died in 1995 is impossible due to this Commons notice
- As an aside, This Uploader just uploaded many PDM licensed images from the US Embassy in New Zealand. They would be PD images in any case. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
16 accounts[edit]
These PDM accounts are own work images.
- The images in Category:Files from 37585279@N03 Flickr stream are from US Army Europe
- The 6 images in Category:Files from 61432045@N04 Flickr stream were taken by a Xioami and Canon camera. They come from Jaime Pereira's flickr account
I ordered a review on 1 of the images and the flickrbot passed the image: File:Oficina de Música IMG 20220526 161611 (53568428068).jpg
- The 20+ images in Category:Files from 147565992@N07 Flickr stream credit a photographer named Joel Vargas in the camera metadata but belongs in the official flickr photostream of someone named Gabriel Souza with 73,000+ images. According to Portugese wikipedia, Gabriel Souza, as Google translate says "is a Brazilian veterinarian and politician, affiliated with the Brazilian Democratic Movement (MDB). He currently serves as vice-governor of Rio Grande do Sul" state of Brazil. So, he is a major politician.
- The 32 images in Category:Files from 53180277@N06 Flickr stream comes from Kancelaria Premiera or "Chancellery of the Prime Minister of Poland."
- The 32 images in Category:Files from 37791261@N06 Flickr stream come from Lau anime X and are watermarked with L Moreira Fotografia. The flickr account owner's newer images have the same watermark which suggests that they are all own work.
- These images in Category:Files from 44161305@N02 Flickr stream are most likely from Tiberio Frascari who has not changed his PDM flickr license for his older images but licenses his newer images today as ARR. The images all use a Nikon D810 Camera.
- The images in Category:Files from 88875109@N00 Flickr stream are from Jack Heywood in Sydney, Australia
- These images in Category:Files from 140152101@N03 Flickr stream are from the official flickr account of Communauté de paroisses de Dettwiller et les collines de Wundratzheim in France.
- The 7 images in in Category:Files from 34457549@N08 Flickr stream are most certainly own work as they were taken from the sky as the source says he prefers to do: Daniel Piraino
- Images in Category:Files from 142791409@N03 Flickr stream is likely own work since they show demonstrations from Colectivo Resistencia which has more than 18,000 flickr images.
- Images in Category:Files from 168976987@N08 Flickr stream are quite consistent and most likely own work by a political party named Lewica Razem - Partia Razem
- These images in Category:Files from 145940735@N08 Flickr stream are own work by SIMON BEESTON who takes plenty of automotive pictures and today licenses his images as ARR.
- The images in Category:Files from 76858203@N04 Flickr stream are most likely own work when you read the detailed flickr profile of Matt Hecht
- These unique 26 images in Category:Files from 90380936@N02 Flickr stream are probably own work by Hetarllen Mumriken since they were all taken by a Canon EOS 70D camera. From the flickr account owner's many photo albums, he likely lives or has lived in Japan.
- The images in Category:Files from 198461362@N08 Flickr stream are own work since they usually name Anutosh Deb the flickr account owner in the camera metadata as in "anutosh64@hotmail.com" or even in the picture below:
- File:PM Shree Kendriya Vidyalaya Khanapara, Guwahati (front side view).jpg
- This next case is quite reasonable. These 18 images from Finland in Category:Files from 9375173@N03 Flickr stream were all taken with an Canon IXUS 285 HS camera and the flickr account owner Lapponica lives in Finland. It is most likely own work.
- Finally, the 13 images in Category:Files from 24921807@N05 Flickr stream are own work from eddie van der walt
- I was suspicious here since I saw eddie had two different sets of Nikon cameras--one of which names eddie van der walt in the camera metadata--but when I ordered a new review on one of the images, the flickrbot passed the image below which means it is not blacklisted:
- File:Amy Winehouse with her Dad (26539496874).jpg....that has camera metadata
The uploader, A1Cafel is also very trustworthy and there can be no question of any copy vio. Maybe this will reduce this PDM Category a bit lower. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- PS: Please do not review this image that I filed a DR on. It comes from a flickrwashing account. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: All categories passed. Except the last one (Category:Files from 141455566@N02 Flickr stream). There are only 2 files in that and you nominated one for deletion. What about the other? Do you think that is okay or did you just not notice that file?
Also im thinking of putting all the red categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review. Then they are easy to find. And they can be added to Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - ok if they look okay or Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok if they are likely problematic. It should be easy to change category with HotCat once they are checked. (I did not create the 2 mentioned categories yet) --MGA73 (talk) 14:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have now created some categories. I hope it will make it easier to check. --MGA73 (talk) 15:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
@MGA73: : I will nominate the second image for deletion as a copyvio. Right now, my real work is very slow so I have a bit of time for Commons projects. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC) The second LTTE image I tagged as a copyvio was deleted. It was initially deleted and then recreated with the same title sadly.
- Comment: Observations on some PDM images that are likely own work.
- Images in Category:Files from 61270229@N05 Flickr stream are PD since they come from the US Navy Medicine flickr account.
- Images in Category:Files from 62812729@N06 Flickr stream are likely own work since they come from the Missouri State Archives flickr account.
This image even says 'public domain': File:MO Auditors - 34 Claire McCaskill (1999-2007) (53189869375).jpg
- Images in Category:Files from 56844220@N00 Flickr stream are most likely own work since madraban the flickr account owner says he lives in England in his images like this example.
- The 24 old black and white images in Category:Files from 8571926@N06 Flickr stream are clearly OK to review since they come from the flickr account of Special Collections University of Newcastle, Australia
- These 18 images in Category:Files from 86773368@N02 Flickr stream come from Tribunal Supremo Electoral El Salvador a government board and is Ok to review
- These images in Category:Files from 28364885@N02 Flickr stream are all OK since they belong to Category:Photographs by the Oregon Department of Transportation and come from the Oregon Department of Transportation flickr account.
- The 19 images in Category:Files from 83367708@N06 Flickr stream are likely own work since they were all taken with a Panasonic DMC-F3 camera from the flickr account of GMH-SD-HH
- The 17 images in Category:Files from 36755450@N05 Flickr stream are consistently from Vietnam and come from this minhphuc_99kdd flickr account. Most were taken with a Sony NEX-6 camera. I always thought they were own work.
- When I ordered a review on one of the images in this category here: File:View of 'Binh An Village Resort Dalat' from Tuyền Lâm Lake (36991674974).jpg, the flickr bot passed it. So, it is not a blacklisted account.
- These 22 images in Category:Files from 26162882@N08 Flickr stream are quite consistent in image resolution and come from the raff2002fr flickr account.
So, I ordered a new review on one of the 21 images here: File:Isla Minima.jpg and the flickr review bot passed it. They are likely own work.
- These 16 images from Russia in Category:Files from 25554263@N04 Flickr stream are most likely own work. The uploader is quite OK and while the flickr source Andrey Korchagin has some 'model photos' on his profile--which were licensed correctly as ARR, his photostream flickr account shows normal Russian buildings. Unless there are sculptures which Commons cannot keep, this flickr account is likely own work
I did order a new review on a correct PDM license on File:Znamemsky Orthodox Church, Dubrovitsy, Moscow region (3020249348).jpg in this category and the flickrbot passed the image.
- The Images in Category:Files from 129248829@N08 Flickr stream are likely safe to review. The uploader, Sikander, is a license reviewer and the images come from evian-off-course which has 48,000 images on flickr. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- The 28 images in Category:Files from 134017397@N03 Flickr stream is certainly safe to review. They come from the Community Archives flickr account in Belleville, Ontario, Canada.
- The 26 images in Category:Files from 132404523@N08 Flickr stream are likely own work. They come from the flickr account of Максим Барбухин somewhere in Russia. I ordered a new review on one of the images here just to be safe: File:Autos (39620479220).jpg and the flickr bot passed the image.
- The 20 images in Category:Files from 39821974@N06 Flickr stream are OK to review. They come from the flickr account of Newcastle Libraries in the UK.
- These 31 images in Category:Files from 93998329@N05 Flickr stream are certainly own work. They come from the flickr account of Minnesota Senate DFL as in the Democratic Party wing of Minnesota
- The 22 images in Category:Files from 70002898@N00 Flickr stream are likely own work since they show pictures of nature and were taken by two 2 NIKON D800 & D810 cameras. They come from the flickr account of brianjobson who licenses his images as ARR today. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- The 31 images in Category:Files from 9539790@N04 Flickr stream are likely own work. They consistently come from Indiana or Indy (as some people call it), USA from Norm and the uploader Missvain has a good reputation.
- The Images in Category:Files from 28709821@N00 Flickr stream are own work. They were all taken by the same Nikon D90 camera and come from the flickr account of Céline Harrand
- The Images in Category:Files from 198418247@N08 Flickr stream are likely own work. They are all from Lisbon and come from the account of Anthony Brass.
I ordered a new review of one of his images here: File:Lisbon (52910073581).jpg and the flickrbot passed it. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- ALL IMAGES in Category:Files from 47557363@N00 Flickr stream are clearly own work from the flickr account of JOHN CHAMPION This person's images camera metadata also name him. Please see File:Will Football (44279359104).jpg
- The images in Category:Files from 192094652@N03 Flickr stream is PD since it is from Glenn Youngkin who is the governor of Virginia.
- All the images in Category:Files from 142868869@N07 Flickr stream are now deleted at the flickr source but they share the same Nikon camera Nikon D3200 camera model. This appears to be indeed own work from the account of Manyac Parets of Catalonia and the pictures are very consistent.
- Images in Category:Files from 135981141@N02 Flickr stream are OK to review since they come from the flickr account of Jair Bolsonaro at 10,111 images. Bolsonaro was the former president of Brazil.
- The images from Category:Files from 139874217@N07 Flickr stream were all taken with a Nikon D3400 camera camera and are likely own work. They come from the flickr account of Yona Mansfield/ iamlaika5
- The 33 images in Category:Files from 82995800@N06 Flickr stream are consistently in Austria with only one in Germany and one in Oman. There is no camera metadata but it looks like own work by chachasarra
- The 29 images in Category:Files from 49707497@N06 Flickr stream is absolutely OK to review since they come from the official flickr account of Number 10 UK Prime Minister.
- The images in Category:Files from 196214338@N03 Flickr stream can be divided into high and low resolution images. The high resolution images were all taken by a Canon EOS 7D Camera and the low resolution images have no camera metadata--perhaps they were scanned. But all images show scenes in Brazil. So, the images are quite consistent overall from the account of Imagens de Rondônia in the state of Rondônia, Brazil.
- The 14 images in Category:Files from 162780215@N08 Flickr stream are very consistent of cyclists from camoak3's flickr account.
I had ordered a review for one of these images in March 2024 here: File:Kasper Asgreen (2022).jpg and the flickrbot passed the image.
- The 27 images in Category:Files from 49251707@N07 Flickr stream are certainly PD since they come from the flickr account of the United States Naval Academy Photo Archive
- The 14 images in Category:Files from 53106173@N05 Flickr stream are PD from the flickr account of Raivi Svensson who says: “Hi I've decided to make all my photos "Public domain". Feel free to use them as you like.”
- The 16 images from Category:Files from 194014626@N04 Flickr stream are reportedly free according to the flickr account owner Chalo Chatu
- Also, the 27 images in Category:Files from 55825136@N02 Flickr stream are look consistent from the flickr account of Daniel Köhn who today licenses his images with a NC restriction.
- Finally, the 30 images in Category:Files from 49283277@N07 Flickr stream are OK to review since they come from the flickr account of Prefeitura de Belo Horizonte that has 62,000+ images in Belo Horizonte city, Brazil.
- Please feel free Michael to check through your image categories and pass images which you know are likely own work. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This Category:Files from 50256734@N05 Flickr stream of images is UNSAFE TO REVIEW. His modern flickr images are OK but those from the 1960s and 1970's are not. I filed 4 Deletion requests already. See here, here, here , here Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:36, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- PS: Many, but not all, of the images from Category:Files from 93850985@N02 Flickr stream can be passed since they use a Panasonic DC-G9 or Apple IPhone 12Pro camera from the flickr account of Julian Dobbs
The question marks are:
- File:Julian Dobbs consecrates Bishop Seabury Church.jpg
- File:Jay Cayangyang Bishop Seabury Consecration.jpg
- File:Consecration of Bishop Seabury Anglican Church.jpg
- File:Church of the Holy Trinity Syracuse NY.jpg
- File:Consecration procession at Bishop Seabury.jpg
Four of the images say the author is "Bridget Nelson" and I don't know if she scanned an image by J. Dobbs. Dobbs today licenses his images as ARR. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think Commons can keep this fifth image and if you agree please file a DR on it below...due to the clear metadata evidence:
- File:Church of the Holy Trinity Syracuse NY.jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed some of the categories (from top to Максим Барбухин). Will take some more tomorrow. --MGA73 (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: OK. Please do so. I will review images in categories with one, two or three images myself just for your information. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: I passed those that were okay. But I parked the tricky ones in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok. --MGA73 (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You. Please feel free to review some image when you have time too. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Five acounts[edit]
- Images in Category:Files from 51149373@N08 Flickr stream are likely own work since they are quite consistent and show images of mostly snow and ice from Robin Kuusela from Handen, Sweden
- Images in Category:Files from 66814958@N04 Flickr stream are clearly own work by Eduardo Pereira His low resolution photos were taken by a Nikon D70s camera while his high resolution images here preserve metadata that name him as the photographer: File:Lisbon, Tagus river, fog, mist, sea,golden hour, light, sun, sunset, bridge (50706209197).jpg & File:Ctraia sardinheira de Esposende Santa Maria dos Anjos (50705376508).jpg
- The 15 images are fine to review in Category:Files from 185802208@N07 Flickr stream since the source flickr account WORT NEWS says "We have no staff photographer, but our news staff updates photographs here. Photos are free for use, with attribution" Today their images are ARR but not in the past.
- The 31 images in Category:Files from 145321515@N04 Flickr stream are consistent and show buildings and churches in Belarus from the flickr account of Kraina Belarus It looks OK to review.
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Great work! --MGA73 (talk) 20:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- These images in Category:Files from 61981636@N06 Flickr stream are certainly own work by Mauro Rubem who (google translate says from his flickr profile) is a "Former State Deputy, dental surgeon, public health specialist and trade unionist. He is a member of the Workers' Party and president of the Central Única dos Trabalhadores de Goiás. He was a councilor in Goiânia, Brazil and elected state deputy three times." All his images were taken by a Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XSi camera and some images like the one below are watermarked with his own name:
- File:Marcha das Vadias - 52º CONUNE (5952265443).jpg
- Also, these 20 images in Category:Files from 152442938@N03 Flickr stream are almost most likely own work by svklimkn Some images were likely scanned and have no metadata but when there is a camera metadata, they name the author SVKLIMKIN like these 2 images below:
- File:Column (35842838435).jpg & File:Wagtail (35179276363).jpg
- The 39 images in Category:Files from 146272349@N06 Flickr stream are by David Schnell I saw David Schnell's recent photostream and he has some freely licensed images "from wikipedia" and "Roger Puta" both from wikiCommons but these 39 images were said to be taken by David Schnell. I also ordered a new review on one of the images below and the flickrbot passed it here: File:Caboose IMG 20210801 170033.jpg which means the account is not blacklisted at present.
- These images in Category:Files from 192105714@N06 Flickr stream come from a now deleted flickr account named shashin micro 43 in Japan but this appears to be certainly legitimate work. Internet Wayback did archive this account so it existed. There are 2 cameras used, both Panasonic models and most were taken by a Panasonic DMC-G7 camera. It is most likely own work from the consistency of the photos. At least they are high resolution images.
- The many images in Category:Files from 186544682@N04 Flickr stream are clearly own work by Justin J. Kiecker who says "I'm a writer in german language (still working on to improve my skills in English). Beside that I'm activist and amateur photographer. I like to share my pictures of events and protests on this account." His images are full of protests.
- Also, the images in Category:Files from 189514336@N02 Flickr stream come from the flickr account of Periodico 26 Las Tunas or the Las Tunas newspaper. The images are quite consistent and the uploader A1Cafel is quite trustworthy here. He uploaded all the images as in this case: File:Nuevasmedidas2 (50169439678).jpg
- The 34 images in Category:Files from 171425013@N02 Flickr stream are OK to review. They come from the flickr account of GeorgeTan # 2...thanks for millionth support who says "1) 1) All my photos are free to download and used in any environment, whether for fun or commercial. No credit or permission is needed. No strings attached!"
- The images in Category:Files from 61591234@N05 Flickr stream were taken with either a HTC PC36100 or a Canon EX-Z750 camera by Dave Hass57 This person stopped uploading pictures to flickr after April 2018 but the photos are still licensed freely. The images are consistently of cars and are likely own work.
- The images in Category:Files from 151176364@N02 Flickr stream are from the flickr account of Erk40 and were taken by a ZTE BLADE V7 LITE camera. From the consistency of the photos, they are likely own work. I also ordered a new review of one of the image and the flickrbot passed the image: File:TMB 1325 (32067273010).jpg
- The 21 images in Category:Files from 152667998@N02 Flickr stream belong to Phil Photos who is, in fact, Phil Weiser, the Attorney General of Colorado. He is a major politician and would have many people working for him.
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will have a look. If you click this link you can see who uploaded the files. It might be worth passing all uploads by the trusted users as you suggested earlier. --MGA73 (talk) 06:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Here is another set of Category:Files from 158350039@N03 Flickr stream that is likely own work by K Bahr In the cosmic photos, he says he took them from his backyard. In his flickr profile, he implies that he suffered a stroke I think and cannot move far anymore. As for your suggestions about the uploader, this is a tricky question. Some uploaders such as Sentinel user have been banned or blocked for sockpuppetry or abusive comments but the images they uploaded are actually legitimate. Life is complicated. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please pass these images in Category:Files from 158350039@N03 Flickr stream for the reasons I gave in the above paragraph about K Bahr.
- Secondly, the images in Category:Files from 63526116@N03 Flickr stream are PDM from 3d U.S. Infantry Regiment "The Old Guard" and most could even be PD-USA Army. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is an interesting case of 35 images Vietnamese images in Category:Files from 157616565@N07 Flickr stream Vietnam stopped having FOP for modern architecture and bridges on January 1, 2023 from this NOTICE but the images were all uploaded before this date in 2022 or 2021. A1Cafel and another Vietnamese user named Đại Việt quốc (now a banned sockpuppett] uploaded most of the images such as the case here: File:Landmark81 (49686971371).png. The images are clearly own work by Coung Tran who used a FUJIFILM X-T20 camera.
- Also the images in Category:Files from 193573697@N05 Flickr stream appear to be own work in India by Ranjan Mistry Only 2 main cameras are used for the high resolution images: a Canon EOS R8 and Nikon D5600 camera. I ordered a new review for File:Ranjan Mistry with Sanjay Chakravarti.jpg from this set of images and the flickrbot passed it.
- The images in Category:Files from 159426554@N07 Flickr stream are likely own work by jerry791251. When there is some camera metadata, the camera used is always a Nikon D750 like this image: File:Kogoro Mouri and Hanzawa-san cosplayers standing 20230430a.jpg and this one File:Tsukimiya Sakura as Watson Amelia sitting without coat, front view 20230430a.jpg
The 50 images in Category:Files from 186395973@N06 Flickr stream are OK to review from the Architecture of Dublin I ordered a new review on File:Drumcondra House (2023).jpg and the flickrbot passed the image here: File:Drumcondra House (2023).jpg
- These images in Category:Files from 187202700@N02 Flickr stream are likely own work by papasdescerebradas in Uruquay or South America. While there is no camera metadata, the images are low to medium resolution consistently. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 20 images in Category:Files from 158934835@N04 Flickr stream are most likely own work since they come from Mark Steele who says he is an outdoor photographer. Most images were taken with a Pentax K10D camera but when he uses a different camera like a Canon EOS REBEL T3i camera, he says so here: File:Summer Berries (Explore) - Flickr - mrksteele04.jpg in the image description and the metadata says it is a Canon EOS REBEL T3i camera.
PS: Most of the other images come from flickr accounts with 2, 3, 5 or 7 images. If you have time, please feel free to pass those which are clearly own work. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- re Yeah no more big accounts. I think when the categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review are fixed we should scan the category for copyvios and then ask the Flickrreview bot to do new reviews. Then the bot will either review or if the flickr user is bad it will mark them. --MGA73 (talk) 19:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment[edit]
Thanks for the link. There are now 4868 images in the category needing review...as long as Ooligan does not upload any new PDM images as cc0.
- As for images in Category:Files from 48243591@N03 Flickr stream, they are almost certainly own work since they show the same person and use the same Nikon D700 camera. The uploader is also Koavf who has many right on wikicommons.
- The 34 images in Category:Files from 91886263@N03 Flickr stream from the account of Алексей Трефилов, they can also be passed since they are rather consistent and show architecture and landscapes in Russia. I ordered a new review one one of his images here: File:Государственный банк (16845327107).jpg and the flickrbot passed it. So the account is OK.
- Please pass these 19 images in Category:Files from 190270151@N02 Flickr stream from the flickr account of GT#3 or George Tan in Singapore. This must be his other flickr account. As I said, he says in his flickr profile: "All my photos are free to download and used in any environment, whether for fun or commercial. No credit or permission is needed." In this image: File:Bloody windows - Flickr - One or Two pictures a day.jpg the camera metadata is preserved and it says the author is George Tan and the picture is Public Domain.
- The images in Category:Files from 150942662@N02 Flickr stream from the flickr account of Lodz Design have 6955 images and therefore share several different camera models. They obviously are a large company and employ several different photographers. But, I personally think this account is OK since this category could be replaced with Category:Łódź Design Festival which was created long ago in 2014. To be certain, I also ordered a new review of one of the images in your Flickr stream category here: File:ŁDF2022 Fot. Marta Strzelczyk.jpg and the flickrbot passed it.
- These images in Category:Files from 198721648@N02 Flickr stream consistently show images in East Africa and appear to be own work by Omar Abdulkadir Same image quality.
- The 29 images in Category:Files from 145874413@N08 Flickr stream were uploaded by banned sockpuppet User:English Roger but the images are legitimate...though not great quality from the flickr account of Fairy Duff] who licenses his/her images as ARR today. I did order a new review on one of the images here: File:Two windmills (31511591614).jpg and the flickrbot passed it.
- The images in Category:Files from 95929490@N06 Flickr stream are all PD today. They depict paintings by Perugino (16th century), Renoir who died in 1919, Umberton Boccioni who died in 1916, etc from the flickr account of Art Gallery ErgsArt - by ErgSap. The Sweat of the Brow doctrine or reproduction of works now in the public domain do not carry copyright (unless the work is totally original which is not the case here) in the USA, UK or EU. So, the images can all be passed by your bot.
- The images in Category:Files from 125103679@N05 Flickr stream can be passed since they all use the same Nikon D5 camera. They come from the account of 劉雙語 The uploader, Solomon203, seems reliable in my opinion. He uploaded some images that were not reviewed by flickr in time before they were deleted on flickr but I restored the flickrlink with the Wayback machine in some cases and the license and image was always right. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Images in Category:Files from 30533017@N00 Flickr stream can be passed from the account of patricia m Why? The images are mostly generic and secondly, the cards apparently come from a 1912 card book here: File:Construc rurales p1 - Flickr - pilllpat (agence eureka).jpg The flickr account owner has other modern derivative images on her photostream but it is correctly licensed as ARR such as this image from my brief examination.
- This large batch of 27 images in Category:Files from 29488979@N06 Flickr stream can be passed from the account of Ian Livesey. It is clearly Ian's work and in one or two images he says the image is PD such as File:Sizergh Castle Red ladder (34355592780).jpg and in File:WCAS - Heads (30827612708).jpg the camera metadata identifies the photographer as Ian Livesy.
- Please pass these 10 images in Category:Files from 165319344@N08 Flickr stream from the flickr account of Jeff Hollett who even lists his functional WikiCommons account in his flickr profile.
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The images in Category:Files from 195487244@N07 Flickr stream come from the flickr account of Derek Sloan who is a Canadian politician and head of the Ontario Party. He did not take pictures of himself but could have hired aphotographer to take the photos of himself and his family. Here is his wikipedia article: Derek Sloan You can decide to pass or not pass the images here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
New paragraph[edit]
Hello Leoboudv! I just had my bot put the new uploads in categories by flickr user. Once the categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review are checked I suggest that you scan for possibly bad files. If you find some you can either nominate them for deletion or put the categories in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok. If in doubt just park them in the "not okay"-category for later check. Once you think the most likely copyvios are nominated for deletion or parked in the "not ok"-category I can ask the Flickrreview bot to do a new review of all the files and have it skip the files in the "not ok"-category. --MGA73 (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I looked at the files in Category:Files from 50256734@N05 Flickr stream. I nominated some for deletion and passed a few other photos (see Category:Files from Mike Lidgley Flickr stream). --MGA73 (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I also checked a few photos from Category:Files from 93850985@N02 Flickr stream and besides the files you noticed by "Bridget Nelson" I also noticed that some files like File:Bishops Herzog and Bena - Holy Trinity Syracuse.jpg says "Raymond's Photography". --MGA73 (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks for the tips. Please don't forget to pass the images by Jeff Hollett in Category:Files from 165319344@N08 Flickr stream I will try to mark a few. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also the 33 images in Category:Files from 58993040@N07 Flickr stream are PD can be passed by your bot as uploads from the US Embassy in Ukraine. Another recent Ooligan upload! Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- The 7 images in Category:Files from 76102799@N07 Flickr stream from the account US Embassy Ghana are PD and can be passed. Another Ooligan upload. I told Ooligan to license PDM images as PDM and not cc0 but he does not listen.
- The 10 personal images in Category:Files from 191860194@N02 Flickr stream can all be passed from the account of Rafael Barreto One of his images here also has a watermark with his name. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 11 images in Category:Files from 149556095@N03 Flickr stream all appear to be own work with a Panasonic or Samsung camera (when there is one) from the account of marcostetter
- The 8 images in Category:Files from 191223857@N04 Flickr stream are quite consistent and are most likely own work from Winehouse Aesthetics
- The 5 images in Category:Files from 8511671@N05 Flickr stream are own work from British Columbia, Canada from the account of S Sauma The images are very consistent and is in the province where I am.
- The 4 images in Category:Files from 94531530@N00 Flickr stream are OK to pass from the account of Granger Meador
- These 6 images in Category:Files from 115281417@N03 Flickr stream are from IBM España and can be passed.
- These images in Category:Files from 156600205@N06 Flickr stream are PD since they are licensed from the flickr account of the Ohio Attorney General
- The 6 images in Category:Files from 65659850@N03 Flickr stream belong to the flickr author Noah Riffe and can be passed. Some of the images even have camera metadata naming him such as File:Bryce Jordan Center Wrestling.jpg
- The 3 images in Category:Files from 61972246@N08 Flickr stream are PD since they come from USEmbassyMEX Us Embassy in Mexico.
- The 3 images in Category:Files from 60564189@N06 Flickr stream are PD since they come from the flickr account of the Arlington National Cemetary
- The 7 images in Category:Files from 136665246@N05 Flickr stream are quite consistent with images in Russia from the flickr account of Dmitriy Protsenko and can be passed. While the flickr account owner has about 3 different cameras which is not suspicious as people change cameras over time. This image even names the flickr account owner in the camera metadata: File:Sunny february noon - Flickr - Staropramen1969.jpg
- ALL 9 images in Category:Files from 65450330@N08 Flickr stream are certainly own work from Nova Scotia, Canada since they were taken with a Canon EOS REBEL T3 camera from the account of Brad Penney
- All 9 images in Category:Files from 93327322@N03 Flickr stream should both be passed and also recategorized with Category:Files from Ayuntamiento Roquetas de Mar Flickr stream since they come from the flickr account of Ayuntamiento Roquetas de Mar in Almeria, Spain.
- The 16 images in Category:Files from 134234212@N02 Flickr stream are OK to pass from the account of Efra Tzuc Many of her images such as File:ClimateStrike (48772576841).jpg even have her name in the camera metadata.
- The 21 images in Category:Files from 131821741@N08 Flickr stream are likely OK to pass from the account of 上島町 観光写真提供サービス in Japan. The pictures are all consistent in quality.
- The 7 images in Category:Files from 57764574@N03 Flickr stream are quite consistent and come from a Nexus and a Canon camera. It is likely own work from TJH1976 and can be passed.
- Also the 14 images in Category:Files from 27842329@N08 Flickr stream can also be passed from the flickr account of *nylon_lover* The composition is mostly the same with the man showing his private body part.
- The 15 images in Category:Files from 141488926@N04 Flickr stream can likely be passed since they come from the account of jordan tavares/Ecureuillographe who says he likes to take black and white and colour photos. That is why the images look inconsistent but they are likely own work.
- The 18 images in Category:Files from 63463750@N02 Flickr stream can all be passed since they come from a Hungarian photographer's account named Noval Goya This person sometimes puts watermarks on his Hungarian images too like this File:Liberty bridge, Budapest (23104966183).png
- Comment: I filed a DR or copyvio AGAINST ALL the images in Category:Files from 191592931@N02 Flickr stream They are likely not own work. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I filed a DR on all images in Category:Files from 165445115@N07 Flickr stream which come from the flickr account of Daniel Molybdenum who says the images are not likely to be his work. They are too high quality space images to be own work too. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I suggest you file a MASS DR on all images in Category:Files from 195676523@N06 Flickr stream from Ronald Furet as the flickr account owner says the images are from Tiempo Zero, Natalia Garcia, www.discogs.com, Diego "Cohete" Rivas, etc, etc. I doubt this Flyer image is own work too. This is a flickrwashing account and I request that you add it to a blacklist ASAP. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I may be away to rest as I am really tired especially after dealing with the Ronald Furet flickrwashing account but I believe most PDM flickr accounts have 1, 2 or 3 images and are very hard to review except by hand. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes sadly it takes time to review the smaller accounts. I think if there are less than 10 files in a category it might be just as fast to review manually.
- I think that once the big categories are reviewed (and the most likely copyvios are marked for deletion) we should ask the Flickrreview bot to review the rest.
- And it looks like a very nice area :-) --MGA73 (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
*Just 8 comments:
- The 7 images in Category:Files from 137439059@N04 Flickr stream are likely own work since they were all taken by a Nikon D3300 camera and share similiar quality and composition. They are from the flickr account of Jesus GR/Job I
- Secondly, the images in Category:Files from 75626679@N07 Flickr stream should be passed and retagged with Category:Files from Gobierno de Guatemala Flickr stream since they come from the flickr account of Gobierno de Guatemala Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:03, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Thirdly, the many images in Category:Files from 51500028@N08 Flickr stream were taken by a Sony ILCE-6000 camera at the same time and likely by andrew.bedwin the flickr account owner. They should be passed.
Fourthly, these mostly low quality images in Category:Files from 126816719@N03 Flickr stream are likely own work by Jon Brinn who stopped uploading pictures to his flickr account in 2018. He takes color and black and white photos as this shows. I think they should be passed.
Fifthly, all these mostly low quality images in Category:Files from 68107928@N08 Flickr stream are own work by gareth patterson They were all taken by a Nikon D3100 camera and should be passed. This flickr user has taken black and white photos in his flickr photostream.
Sixthly, the images in Category:Files from 23408922@N07 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work by Pete who even says in his flickr profile: "Unless my photos are 'all rights reserved' (of which I've got very few) then I don't mind if you don't credit me when you use it, PROVIDING you either Flickrmail me or leave a comment to say where it is that it's been used." This implies that he is OK with the use of his freely licensed images and know copyright. Finally, I ordered a review on one of his images here: File:Blue Skies (29803486328).jpg and the flickrbot passed it. His images should be passed.
Seventh, the 9 images in Category:Files from 120757847@N06 Flickr stream must be own work and should be passed since they show the same high image quality and subject composition and were all taken by a Canon EOS 5D Mark II or III or Canon EOS R6 camera. The flickr account owner has now deleted the images but they were reviewed as PDM by the flickr review bot.
- Finally, the 8 images in Category:Files from 131176253@N05 Flickr stream are all from Portugal and while they use a Panasonic and Nikon camera and a single Kodak camera for the oldest 2004 image, I believe they are all own work by John O'Beirne since they focus on nature, the beach and sea. (all the same general objects) They likely can be passed since the single uploader Tm knows copyright. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The 2024 images in Category:Files from 61432045@N04 Flickr stream like this were taken by a Canon Powershot camera and the 2022 uploaded photos were taken by a Xiaomi camera like this from the account of Jaime Pereira The images are consistent, appear to be own work and should be passed, I think. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The images in Category:Files from 29583810@N08 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work by les brown from Canada as the camera bears his name here as does the flickr link for his images as in this example here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/les_brown/29140423055/ The images should be passed. --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I notice the images in Category:Files from 130241850@N07 Flickr stream and Category:Files from 126224311@N07 Flickr stream use the same Nikon and Sony cameras respectively. This cannot be a coincidence and images appear consistent. But its your decision to pass them or not. --Leoboudv (talk) 11:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: I created a few new categories so there are now 18 categories to check. So we can soon do a mass request to the bot to check the files. --MGA73 (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment[edit]
- The 16 images in Category:Files from 108438803@N04 Flickr stream are likely own work by Isaac Queiroz. They are all from Brazil, I think.
- The 13 images in Category:Files from 119531356@N06 Flickr stream have an existing 2022 category called Category:Photographs of Brest (France) by Jean-Marie Zanoni and are all from Brest, France and were taken by a Nikon D5100 camera. This is own work by Jean-Marie ZANONI and should be passed.
- The 13 images in Category:Files from 125163985@N05 Flickr stream show church or clergy man and woman are certainly legitimate images from the official flickr account of the Western Pennsylvania Conference - United Methodist Church They should be passed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The images in Category:Files from 196271743@N07 Flickr stream appear to be own work by Stephanie See I did a Tin Eye search for one of the images and found no results. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The 8 images in Category:Files from 56102581@N02 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work by Eugene O'Loughlin who takes pictures of such unique items on his photostream. Secondly, all the images seem to have been taken by a Google Pixel 3a camera. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The 29 images in Category:Files from Oregon City High School Flickr stream are certainly own work by the official flickr account of the Oregon City High School. A few images were passed but many are not passed. All should be passed. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The 5 images in Category:Files from 59430255@N04 Flickr stream from the account of Podemos Volar Programa radial in Costa Rica were all taken by a Nikon D70 camera and is most likely own work and can be passed.
- Comment: The 8 images in Category:Files from 49036339@N04 Flickr stream by Jimmy Rivera is certainly own work and can be passed. His newer camera (unlike the old Kodak camera) also has metadata that has his name here: File:Vista de El Viejo San Juan desde Barrio Palo Seco, Toa Baja, Puerto Rico.jpg and here: File:Place in Boquerón, Las Piedras, Puerto Rico.jpg
- The images in Category:Files from 188543350@N02 Flickr stream are likely NOT OK to pass because they are Derivative images and we don't know who holds the rights to this image. The flickr account owner sometimes takes images from other websites for his flickr images as in this example Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Images in Category:Files from 55001154@N03 Flickr stream ARE PROBLEMATIC and I think, NOT OK. Many black and white military images are derivatives including this DR I filed where the image can be saved. Other cases are unclear like this or this image by Arjan Koning. Who owns the rights to the images from facebook or Arjan Koning? The flicks account owner is Pabo and it gives his email address but it does not match the Email given in this other photo where it says the author is at "contact: wdmreg@gmail.com" from the camera metadata. The Email addresses do not match at all. This Second Photo says who "wdmreg@gmail.com" is: W.F.de Mol in the camera metadata. This name does not sound like Pabo at all. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think its clear that these 15 images in Category:Files from 199819450@N06 Flickr stream were taken on March 6, 2024 by ptheodores5 All images were taken with an Apple iPhone 13 . They should be passed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: These 8 images in Category:Files from 119935103@N04 Flickr stream were mostly taken with an Olympus camera and from the composition of the images at sea in Australia by Alan Travers I am certain it is own work and should be passed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The 10 images in Category:Files from 191772434@N02 Flickr stream are own work from Warszawska Akademia Medyczna or the Warsaw Medical Academy. They should all be passed. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: All 11 images in Category:Files from 94157272@N06 Flickr stream were taken with a Nikon D7100 camera from the flickr account of Scott Willoughby I am certain this is own work and should be passed. Only one image here has camera metadata naming the author here: File:DSC 9881 (49995148081).jpg but its certainly own work. But please feel free to check. Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: At least 6 of the images here in Category:Files from 29903115@N06 Flickr stream could be retagged with {{PD-Australia}} and passed such as the Hobart images. Also virtually all of the 28 images in Category:Files from 70994841@N07 Flickr stream can also be retagged with {{PD-Australia}} and passed since they were taken by 1955 or are 50 years old.
- PS: I had filed a Deletion Request against one of the 3 images in Category:Files from 192723874@N06 Flickr stream but have withdrawn my nomination and think that the images can be passed based on the uploader's comments. The photographer is the brother of the flickr account owner in two of the images. Maybe one can assume some good faith and just pass them. But feel free to think twice about this case. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Good work! I parked the (possibly) bad files in the not-okay category so my bot can skip them. I passed the files from Australia. The flickr review only confirm that the uploader at flickr marked them as PD. Not that the uploader was right. It should be easier for everyone to check now there is an actual copyright template. I also passed the last 3 files. Who ever closes the DR can decide. But if possible it is better with a permission to COM:VRTS.
Nice that there are only a few categories left to check. So we can soon ask Flick review bot to check a few hundred files to see how it works. --MGA73 (talk) 16:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: User Luiz79 uploaded about 300-350 images today as cc0 when it was PDM and it is too much for me to change it. Perhaps your bot can change the license, pass it and remove it from the PDM category please...as it did for his earliest uploads here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: User Ooligan also continues to upload some images which as CC0 when they are in fact PDM.
- Secondly, images in Category:Files from 92900223@N03 Flickr stream could be from the flickr account of Fotos Antigas RS - Visite www.prati.com.br since they have watermarks on their photos saying prati.com.br It is not a 100% guarantee but it could be own work if you click on the photos. The Prati website given on the flickr profile is live so the flickr account may indeed be legitimate. But if passed some image licenses like this here: File:Porto Alegre Planta 1772.jpg must be changed to PDM. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:07, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Images in Category:Files from 195480949@N07 Flickr stream may be legitimate or may be flickrwashes. The source account here: flickr account has at 3 derivative images but when I do a TinEye search for one of the images in this category which is actually used on wikipedia, I get zero results. The same here: File:Anil Vasave.jpg for this TinEye search which was taken by a Xiamo Redmi Note 9 Chinese camera. I know that India has banned many Chinese products like Tik Tok and Huawei since China attacked and took a small part of India's territory under Modi but this camera can be bought in India. So, the images could be legitimate especially with the TinEye evidence. Its a hard call. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 4 images in Category:Files from 91693141@N05 Flickr stream are certainly own work by Joel Saland The images were all taken by a Nikon COOLPIX S6300 camera. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 5 images in Category:Files from 195739491@N06 Flickr stream are almost certainly own work by Martin Kršjak. It has the same camera composition and all photos were taken with a Motorola Moto G (5) camera.
- These 4 images in Category:Files from 65513775@N05 Flickr stream are Danish and you would know if it is own work. It looks like own work by Dansk Folkeparti Kolding whoever or whatever that is.
- Finally, the images in Category:Files from 156515782@N02 Flickr stream are a mix of derivative images and re-enactor actors in the photos. I don't know what to do with this category. After you decide what to do with this category, maybe you can ask your bot to do a mass review of the rest of the PDM images. A few of the PDM images were deleted at the source but most images are still on the flickrlink. Also, perhaps it would be best to put the NOT OK flickr image accounts on the blacklist. This is just a suggestion You would decide here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- As an aside, thanks Michael for the barnstar award but I must tell you that life in Canada is very hard today. Housing and Food prices have skyrocketed due to inflation after the large government spending during the 2020-2021 covid era and we have retired teachers and nurses going to foodbanks just to survive because they are on fixed pensions. More and more people are going to foodbanks and there are many people living in homeless camps in Canada's parks. Rents and prices for condos, townhomes or single family homes have spriralled out of control. Canada is a great country to visit but not to live in due to high inflation and high government taxes. There is an article here which you can read here (in future) when you have time and it shows how tough Canada is today in 2023-2024: https://macleans.ca/longforms/food-banks-affordability-inflation-groceries People have jobs and they still cannot afford living here since rents take up to 50 to 60% of their income today. The rest of the people' income goes to food and people have little left for an investment or savings. Hopefully Denmark is in a better situation. I have more time for wikipedia right now because my real estate work is very slow and many people are struggling to buy any real estate. Unlike America, Canada does not have many rich people. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- First, it may be time to do a mass review or pass of the rest of the PDM images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Sorry to hear things are hard in Canada. Things goes rather well in Denmark so no worries here.
Yeah I noticed that new files are still uploaded so I left a message about using the correct license. I hope it will help when we both say it.
I reviewed the files now in Category:Files from Fotos Antigas RS Flickr stream. You wrote some of the files should be changed to PDM. Did you mean PD-old-something?
I will look at the other categories tomorrow. If you have time it would be great if you could look for possibly bad files and nominate them for deletion or if you are not sure just put them in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok. Then I can ask my bot to skip them and we can check them later. --MGA73 (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Images in Category:Files from 141430065@N05 Flickr stream are almost certainly by Rodney Emmott
- Please don't forget about these 4 images in Category:Files from 65513775@N05 Flickr stream are Danish and you would know if it is own work. It looks like own work by Dansk Folkeparti Kolding whoever or whatever that is.
- NOTE: The 10 images in Category:Files from 193098256@N08 Flickr stream from the account of Klub Lewicy should be reclassified as Category:Files from The Left (Poland) Parliamentary Group Flickr stream and passed.
- The 4 images in Category:Files from 152159094@N08 Flickr stream are own work by Trader Kimo. They were taken by the same samsung camera.
- These 6 images in Category:Files from 143996116@N07 Flickr stream are from the Monash Public Library Service from Australia and should be passed.
My ANALYSIS ON THE SITUATION:
- Comment: Images in the first 5 flickr account under 'F' in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok should be nominated for deletion if possible. Also certainly the first 5 flickr source accounts should also be added to a blacklist. As for the tormentor images, maybe let them be...most appear to be WWI or WWI era and presumably PD anyway. Personally, I suspect the other images in the PDM category are mostly legitimate...so it may be time to maybe order a new mass review or just pass the PDM images now. There are probably a few copyvios but less than 10 images out of 4000+ images. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- As an aside, I filed many DRs (more than 10) on PDM images Here on Sophia Loren, here, Here, a Mass DR of 8 images, another here and Here and finally one more The other DRs I filed have already been deleted. There just are not many copyvios in the PDM category that I can see. I think its may be time to pass the other PDM images which are not in "NOT OK" accounts. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
PS: You asked about copyvios and there are 2 or 3 in Category:Files from 59170444@N05 Flickr stream: The black and white images are likely copyvios but the colour images are own work since they are consistently taken with a Samsung M-N960F camera.
- File:Fiat 600D Récord (Vignale) Salón de Turín (Italia) 1962.jpg was uploaded to this flickr account in November 2020 but this image is already stated to be a 1962 photo from the image title! TinEye shows images as early as 2015 and 2016 already.
- File:Harrod's electric van, (1939).jpg was taken from the "National Motor Museum/Heritage Images" from the metadata which is likely from THIS WEBPAGE where images are Not Free.
- File:Fiat 600D Récord (Vignale). Salón de Turín (Italia) 1962 - 2.jpg is stated to be a 1962 image and cannot be own work...like the first example.
The other images are colour photos and all own work, I believe, since they were all taken with a Samsung M-N960F camera. This is my last PDM copyvio check. This was an obvious catch from Txemari's flickr account.
- There are very few copyvios left to find in the PDM category. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I filed copy vio notices against File:Gedela Srinubabu CEO Pulsus with Narendra Modi, Indian Prime Minister and G20 President - 53321175887.jpg, & File:Gedela Srinubabu CEO Pulsus with Narendra Modi, Indian Prime Minister and G20 President.jpg and File:Gedela Srinubabu CEO Pulsus with Narendra Modi, Indian Prime Minister and G20 President - 53322397054.jpg I have no more to give. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Thank you! I tagged a few for a new review by the Flickrreview bot yesterday but I skipped some. They are now the first few files in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review. They are probably not own work but could be PD or Flickr user could have got the copyrights in some way.
I will start mass tagging files this weekend. If you spot any copyvios just nominate for deletion or add them to the "not okay-category" so we can check them later. --MGA73 (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! I started Commons:Deletion_requests/File:NAR_Artist_Concept_(51049894377).jpg for the files in Category:Files from 188543350@N02 Flickr stream.
- About Category:Files from 195676523@N06 Flickr stream I noticed that according to https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13538443/ Ronald Furet is one of the band members in Tiempo Zero. So it could be their official flickr account. --MGA73 (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
New paragraph[edit]
- Comment: You are right about Ronald Furet and Category:Files from 195676523@N06 Flickr stream This account can probably be removed from the NOT OK list and its images passed now, I suppose. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well I passed and moved to Category:Files from Ronald Furet Flickr stream. But I started this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Berlin Wall (51231292181).jpg so we can get someone else to judge. --MGA73 (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. Thank You. I voted in the DR to delete.
- As an aside, I was thinking yesterday of filing a DR on images in this category Category:Files from 197326331@N04 Flickr stream but when I did TinEye searches, I got zero results even though the metadata for some images is small. It could be own work somehow...but the uploader has this Creepy Message on his userpage. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- This image looks like it was taken from a TV broadcast but there are zero TinEye results here and here for some of his other images. I don't like the fact that some of his images metadata is so small but the images are from 2023 or quite new. Maybe you know what to do? Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- The 7 images in Category:Files from 187878392@N04 Flickr stream are clearly own work since they were all taken by an iPhone 13 Pro camera from the account of Yanay Rosen
- ALL THESE 87 images in Category:Files from 41284017@N08 Flickr stream are recent uploads by Ooligan sadly. I marked only 2 of them.
- SECONDLY, these 13 images in Category:Files from 60564189@N06 Flickr stream are also recent uploads by Ooligan. I did not mark any as he has ignored my messages NOT to upload PDM images as cc0.
- The 11 images in Category:Files from 130612951@N03 Flickr stream are own work by Gurval LeBouter/ Sketyl none They were all taken by a FUJI FILM X-M1 camera. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- In these 3 PDM images in Category:Files from 56244585@N05 Flickr stream the Commons uploader is probably the flickr account owner. It is own work and should be passed. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- All 12 images in Category:Files from 135292225@N03 Flickr stream are own work by Gut Porter from Warshaw, Poland. Many images even have his watermark such as File:Porzucona barka (43188849785).jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 4 images in Category:Files from 146349034@N03 Flickr stream are own work by Dmitriy Zhukov Three of the four PDM images were taken by the same Apple iPhone camera. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 4 images in Category:Files from 155725846@N03 Flickr stream are all own work from BLP Photos with the same photographer in the camera metadata. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 3 images in Category:Files from 9660000@N06 Flickr stream are most likely own work by brunofoc --Leoboudv (talk) 06:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 6 images in Category:Files from 182901222@N05 Flickr stream are an interesting case. They were taken by Liberal PM Justin Trudeau's official photographer and apparently given to one of Trudeau's own MPs (or Member of Parliament). This person is Darren Fisher Liberal MP for Nova Scotia, Canada. I think they can be passed since Fisher is one of Trudeau's MPs. All the photos include Darren Fisher too.
- The 8 simple images of flags in Category:Files from 125891594@N05 Flickr stream are clearly public domain since they cannot be copyrighted. They are from the flickr account of Instituto Gallaecia
- Comment: These 4 images in Category:Files from 192971287@N07 Flickr stream are own work by Steven He since they were taken by the same camera. HOWEVER, the license here is still CC0. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- These 9 mostly sea and park images in Category:Files from 146832554@N06 Flickr stream are most likely own work by Pom’ who even lists his numerous cameras: "Digital Compact cameras : Olympus C830L (2000-†2005),
Canon Ixus 500 (2005-†2007),
Panasonic Lumix TZ 3 (2007-†2011),
Panasonic Lumix TZ 10 (2011-†2012),
Panasonic Lumix TZ 30 (2012- still in use but not used much, dust inside the optics ; GPS included, which was very useful and not available any more in newer cameras...
Panasonic Lumix TZ 101 (2018- (†2020 : expensive replacement of camera optics, the zoom was dead...)-††2023, really dead)
Sony DSC-RX100M3 (2020-
Panasonic Lumix TZ200 (2023-
Reflex camera Canon EOS 400D (2008-. Lens Sigma 18/200 (2008-†2016) Canon 18/200 (2017-)
Cameraphones : Wiko (2014-15), Sony (2015-17), Samsung s7 (2017-†2022), Samsung s10e (2019- ), Samsung S21 FE (2022- )"
- In these 7 images in Category:Files from 24973246@N00 Flickr stream , the Commons uploader is actually the flickr account owner Albert Labrede and he/she really understands Algerian copyright law. The images should be passed.
- The 4 images in Category:Files from 140925193@N05 Flickr stream are all certainly PD from the Black Hills National Forest
- These 8 images in Category:Files from 16427963@N08 Flickr stream are likely own work by Cedric Lehmann. The composition is quite similiar and the uploader is an Admin from Commons.
- Finally, these 8 images were taken by 2-3 different cameras in Category:Files from 158176244@N07 Flickr stream but they are ALL in Taiwan which tells me that it is most likely own work by Doug Tsai Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
@Leoboudv: Hi! I passed the 87 files and started to mass tag files for a new review. I have added some photos to Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review - not ok to make the bot skip them. It will be interessting to see how many needs to be fixed manually. --MGA73 (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: It is like I said Michael. There are just very few copyvios left. You might as well request your bot to do a mass review or mass pass of the rest of rest the images in the PDM category. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Dear MICHAEL,
- Please place all images in Category:Files from 193751847@N03 Flickr stream on the NOT OK list. It comes from a flickrwashing account and I have launched 2 DRs already here and here. I have requested that it be blacklisted ASAP over here. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Another Copyvio in Category:Files from 199287244@N05 Flickr stream Best,
- Comment: Finally, I filed a DR on this image here File:BCER Interurban at Hastings and Main, 1951.jpg. It is in this category here: Category:Files from 45379817@N08 Flickr stream which is in the NOT OK list already. If you want, you can file a DR on the rest of these images due to the reason given in the flickr author's profile here: Rob "While some photographs are mine, the majority are images acquired from various sources on the Internet. I've made the effort over the last few years to collect these images of BC, mostly of postcards, for the purpose of
HISTORICAL INTEREST. I maintain them here and keep them PUBLIC for the enjoyment and learning of all who may be interested. I claim NO ownership or copyright to any of the acquired, historical images." I have no idea if old postcards are copyrightable. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Good morning from Denmark! Files allready nominated for deletion will be skipped so they do not have to be added to the "not ok" category. I will ask bot to review some more files and hope that there are not too many that gets stuck in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review. --MGA73 (talk) 07:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review is now below 2k. I suggest to wait a few days before more files are bot reviewed so we have time to see if it looks okay. If it does I think we can do the rest too. --MGA73 (talk) 09:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Good morning from Denmark! Files allready nominated for deletion will be skipped so they do not have to be added to the "not ok" category. I will ask bot to review some more files and hope that there are not too many that gets stuck in Category:Flickr public domain images needing human review - pending bot review. --MGA73 (talk) 07:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: OK. Thank you for your help and Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[edit]
File:Nava38.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Krd 03:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Blocks[edit]
AlCafel was blocked today. Are there any trustworthy uploaders left?? Yikes, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- File:Didier Deschamps et Marcel Desailly.jpg is a copyvio. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- File:Jarrah Hussein Al-Silawi.jpg is a really suspicious image. Just read my DR on it carefully. 4 months after upload and the image is already gone from a flickr account with one image that has some watermarks on it.
- Finally a user named Acabashi uploaded 390+ images that were licensed PDM on Sunday Like This....but he forgot to type in {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} & {{Flickrreview}}
So, they ended up in this Category . they are basically from Bernard Spraggs NZ flickr account. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Ooligan also uploaded 32 images from the LBJ Library that were licensed as PDM on flickr as CC0 on Commons such as this File:LBJ Foundation and More Perfect conference called Trust News Democracy, at the LBJ Presidential Library in Austin, Texas on 9 April 2024 - 1.jpg Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: As I understand it A1Cafel did not upload copyvios etc. It was other problems that was the reason for the block. I will look at your finds a little later. :-) --MGA73 (talk) 13:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- You allready cleaned up a lot of files so I asked my bot to work on a few hundred files more. --MGA73 (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't know but this image apparently has a legitimate OTRS (now VRTS?) ticket: File:Betsy Beutler.jpg
And yes. Ooligan uploaded a few more PDM images as CC0. I marked most but not all of them. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: The VRT beats the Flickr review so I just removed the template. While we work on the files my bot will change CC0 to PDM so no need to do it manually.
- How does it look so far? Should I request a review for the last files or are there too many bad files among them? --MGA73 (talk) 05:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I would suggest you run a review for all of the last PDM files and clear The PDM Category. I did not see any obvious copyvios....which you did not already tag and place in the NOT OK section. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also User Secret Name uploaded 1239 PDM images (2 images were prexisting) like this one here with no license: File:2023 LLSWS — Day 8 (53117238914).jpg & File:LLSBWS Day 8 (51400987130).jpg That is why I suggest you just run a review on all the PDM images....just to pass older PDM images from 2019to 2023. Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)